World news, war and conflict, and global politics

Home » Operation Absolute Resolve: The US Military Raid That Reshaped Venezuela

Operation Absolute Resolve: The US Military Raid That Reshaped Venezuela

By

–

Operation Absolute Resolve: The US Military Raid That Reshaped Venezuela

CARACAS, October 26, 2026 — On January 3, 2026, the United States launched Operation Absolute Resolve, a military strike that captured President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, an event that reshaped the political and economic landscape of Venezuela and triggered a Pentagon crackdown on prediction-market wagering.

Strategic Objectives: Oil and Governance

The United States justified the January intervention as a law-enforcement action with military support, asserting that the president holds “inherent constitutional authority” to undertake such operations. According to reporting, access to Venezuelan oil was a core reason for the action. Following the raid, the US State Department, now led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, exercised control over core aspects of Venezuela’s governance, including its domestic finances, government appointments, revenues, foreign policy, and the distribution of natural resources. The administration announced a 50-million-barrel oil supply deal with the remaining Venezuelan government, with the first $300 million received on January 20. On January 29, a new law was passed to give private companies control over the production and sale of oil, paralleling the lifting of sanctions on Venezuelan oil trade.

The Human and Financial Toll

The operation began just after 2 a.m. local time when explosions were observed across northern Venezuela. US forces bombed infrastructure to suppress air defenses while an apprehension force attacked Maduro’s compound in Caracas. The aftermath was significant: approximately 80 people died, including Venezuelan and Cuban military personnel and civilians, and seven American soldiers were wounded. Venezuelan officials reported at least 23 security officers killed, while the Cuban government stated 32 of its military and intelligence agents died. The raid drew condemnation from the United Nations and international law experts, who argued it violated the UN Charter and Venezuela’s sovereignty. Conversely, the Venezuelan diaspora celebrated the capture, and multiple political prisoners, including foreigners, were released in the months following the strike.

Pentagon Crackdown on Prediction Markets

The US military operation also ignited a debate over national security and financial ethics. Master Sgt. Gannon Ken Van Dyke, an Army Special Forces noncommissioned officer, is accused of using classified information to win over $400,000 betting on the raid’s timing. According to federal prosecutors, Van Dyke placed about $33,000 in wagers on the Polymarket platform, with the final bets placed hours before the overnight raid. His trial is tentatively set for December 7, 2026. In response, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memo on October 20, 2026, barring all Pentagon personnel from using nonpublic information to bet on military outcomes on platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi. A research group identified 152 suspicious accounts that won a combined $8 million on defense-related prediction markets, highlighting the broader risk of insider trading compromising operational security.

Current US Influence

Following the intervention, the United States reopened its embassy in Caracas in February 2026, the first time since 2019. The Venezuelan government remained in place, with Vice President Delcy Rodríguez sworn in as acting president on January 5. Since the operation, the US State Department has maintained control over Venezuela’s domestic finances, appointments, and resource distribution. The long-term trajectory of US-Venezuela relations remains defined by the enduring economic and political leverage established in the wake of Operation Absolute Resolve.

Operational Security and the Warrior Ethos

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s October 20, 2026, memo addressed to senior Pentagon leadership, combatant commanders, and directors of Defense agencies, warned that financial wagers on military outcomes create signals that hostile foreign intelligence services can aggregate, correlate, and exploit to anticipate U.S. movements, targets, and timing. The directive explicitly prohibits the use of both classified and unclassified nonpublic information for betting on any financial platform, including crypto currency exchanges or third-party workarounds. Violators face administrative, disciplinary, and criminal action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice or applicable federal law.

Beyond the immediate risks to operational security, Hegseth emphasized that financial stakes threaten to distort the judgment of service members. The memo stated that a logistician with money riding on a strike date develops a personal interest in that specific date, while an analyst with a position on an outcome gains an interest in that outcome. Hegseth characterized this as a dilution of the warrior ethos that the Department of Defense has strived to eradicate. This policy shift followed a May 2026 letter from a bipartisan group of lawmakers who urged the Secretary to prohibit personnel from betting on national-security events.

The Anti-Corruption Data Collective noted that because every Polymarket trade settles on a public blockchain in real time, an insider betting on confidential information is effectively broadcasting that data to adversaries. Research by the group identified 152 suspicious accounts that won approximately $8 million on military and defense contracts, with longshot bets succeeding 52% of the time. Polymarket has reportedly referred dozens of potential insider cases to the Justice Department for review.

The April Insider Trading Case

In April 2026, Master Sgt. Gannon Ken Van Dyke, an Army Special Forces noncommissioned officer assigned to U.S. Army Special Operations Command, was charged by federal prosecutors in Manhattan with using sensitive information from Operation Absolute Resolve to place wagers on the Polymarket platform. According to the federal complaint, Van Dyke placed about $33,000 in bets, with the final wagers hours before the overnight raid that captured former-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The positions paid out more than $400,000. Van Dyke pleaded not guilty and was released on a $250,000 bond. The case marked the first U.S. prediction-market insider case to reach trial, with a federal judge setting a tentative date of December 7, 2026.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s October 20, 2026, memo directly addressed the Van Dyke case, warning that financial stakes threaten to distort the judgment of service members. The memo stated that a logistician with money riding on a strike date develops a personal interest in that specific date, while an analyst with a position on an outcome gains an interest in that outcome. Hegseth characterized this as a dilution of the warrior ethos that the Department of Defense has strived to eradicate. This policy shift followed a May 2026 letter from a bipartisan group of lawmakers who urged the Secretary to prohibit personnel from betting on national-security events. The Anti-Corruption Data Collective noted that because every Polymarket trade settles on a public blockchain in real time, an insider betting on confidential information is effectively broadcasting that data to adversaries.

Sources

Photo: Guillermo Ramos Flamerich (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Get breaking stories first on our Telegram channel.

More stories by

Most read

War & Conflict

World News

International Conflict

Politics