World news, war and conflict, and global politics

Home » WTO Report Warns Trading System Faces Critical Juncture With Three Futures

WTO Report Warns Poorest Countries Stand to Lose Most if Trade Rules Erode

By

–

WTO Report Warns Trading System Faces Critical Juncture With Three Futures

Lose the rules, and the poorest pay the most. That is the hard message in the World Trade Report 2026 from the World Trade Organization, titled “A Critical Juncture for the World Trading System.” For families in the least-developed countries, the numbers are not abstract.

The report sets out three futures. In the best one, stronger multilateral cooperation lifts global GDP by 2.9%, about $3.0 trillion by 2050, and global exports by 17.9%. Least-developed countries (LDCs) would see their GDP rise 7.7% and their exports climb 45%.

The other two are grim. Take a “geo-fragmented” world split along geopolitical lines: global GDP falls 5.1% and exports 18.6%. Then take an “FTA world,” where a patchwork of free-trade agreements replaces shared rules and the groupings barely cooperate. There, global GDP drops 6.9% and exports 26.9%. Failing to strengthen the system could cut global output by as much as 10%, the report suggests.

Who loses most

The losses would not be shared equally. In the fragmented world, real GDP in LDCs would shrink 10.6%, against 7.3% for middle-income economies and 2.9% for high-income ones. In the FTA world, LDC export losses could reach 45%. As The Financial Express put it in an editorial, big markets with bargaining power and money for technology negotiate better terms, while poorer economies may be shut out of preferential deals or forced to take terms written by others.

There are 44 LDCs on the UN list, and 37 are WTO members. Bangladesh is the largest merchandise exporter among them, responsible for about 17% of LDC exports. Together, LDC exports rose 11% last year to $309 billion, and their share of world merchandise exports reached 1.21% in 2025. Still small, in other words.

For Bangladesh, which is preparing to move beyond LDC status, the editorial warned that access to markets cannot be taken for granted. The question, it argued, is whether the rules stay inclusive enough for the weakest traders, or whether differences in economic power decide who gets in.

Sources

Get breaking stories first on our Telegram channel.

More stories by

Most read

War & Conflict

World News

International Conflict

Politics