World news, war and conflict, and global politics

Home » US and Iran Near Historic Nuclear Program Agreement Deal

One Page to End a War: US and Iran Close In on a Memo

By

–

US and Iran Near Historic Nuclear Program Agreement Deal

The story begins, as these stories often do, with a photograph and a rumor. On May 5, an Iranian woman walked past an anti-Israeli mural on a Tehran street; by the next day, word was moving through world capitals that the war she has been living beside might be ended by a single sheet of paper. Axios reported on Wednesday, May 6, that the White House believes it is closing in on a one-page memorandum of understanding with Iran, one that would stop the fighting and frame the harder nuclear talks still to come, attributing the account to two U.S. officials and two further sources briefed on the matter.

What unfolded in the report is a negotiation at its most delicate stage. Washington expects Iran’s answers on several key points within 48 hours; nothing has been agreed yet, Axios cautioned, but this is said to be the closest the two countries have come to an agreement since the war began. The text itself runs to 14 points on one page, and it has been shaped by envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in talks with several Iranian officials, held directly and through mediators.

At its heart, the reported bargain has three pillars. Iran would commit to a moratorium on enriching uranium; the United States would lift its sanctions and free up billions in frozen Iranian funds; and the two sides would together ease the restrictions choking transit through the Strait of Hormuz. In the shape Axios describes, the memorandum would declare the war in the region over and open a 30-day window for negotiating the fuller agreement, covering the strait’s reopening, the limits on Iran’s nuclear programme and the lifting of American sanctions.

The choreography around that window is spelled out too. Iranian shipping curbs and the American naval blockade would ease gradually across the 30 days, and should the talks collapse, U.S. forces could put the blockade back in place or return to military action, one U.S. official told Axios. It is a design built for two parties that do not trust each other, which is to say a design built for these two.

For those involved, the backdrop is raw. President Donald Trump had just paused a naval mission, three days old, that had been sent to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and had badly shaken the war’s ceasefire, itself only a month old. Iran said earlier on Wednesday it would take a peace deal only on terms it considered “fair”. Reuters could not immediately verify the Axios account, and the State Department and the White House did not respond to a request for comment, so a degree of haze remains over the whole account. Markets did not wait for the haze to clear: U.S. stock index futures extended their gains on the news.

The page, in other words, is more promise than settlement. Everything genuinely difficult, enrichment levels, frozen assets, who controls a strait that carries a fifth of the world’s oil, is deferred into the talks the memo would trigger. But a war that has closed a waterway, rattled a ceasefire and emptied harbors has to end somewhere, and for one afternoon in May the reported answer was: on one page, within 48 hours, if the word coming back from Tehran is fair.

Sources

Get breaking stories first on our Telegram channel.

More stories by

Most read

War & Conflict

World News

International Conflict

Politics